"The God Delusion" a delusion in and of itself, is the pointless writing of Dr. Richard Dawkins, self appointed minister of the mindless and godless. He states in his book, The God Delusion, that the probability of a God was 95% to 99% impossible. As a scientific philosopher, I wonder where the factual references are for such a statement. Where does the man come up with these figures? Perhaps out of his own ‘de-conversion’ since he found Darwin, or behind his smile, there is a lying maniacal individual. It is hard to tell. He seems pleasant enough and soft spoken in lecturing; however his pattern of behavior is of one bent on ‘de-converting all.’
He is somewhat well versed on Darwinian Theories and scientific information. I can only assume there is in him a sense of awe at the beauties of nature, yet he has only peered into the flask of biological chemistry so far to validate his views and dares not go further. For if he did, there is an overwhelming mountain of evidence; both data driven and empirical logic, as Einstein would phrase it, to have him take a second look through the microscope. He seems rather prejudice against Intellectual Design , believing the phrase equates to a supreme being, and if it does not, life’s spark may have originated else where in the vastness of space through some Darwinian-type of unguided mutation and one in 100 to the 10the power, precisely landed on this planet which was in the correct life zone away from its host star to be friendly to such a life, which is again very unlikely that that life form would be welcome in this environment.
After reading the book, if anything, I came to the conclusion the man does not understand or grasp the science of translation and archeology, is rather delusional of his own importance, or just delusional.
The argument of whether there is a God as a Divine Creator or there is a Pre-programmed subatomic particles which obey pre-determined rules and laws or there is not. For in studying Charles Darwin’s hypothesis, there are too many open-ended statements which are not scientific and not factual, even though proponents loudly proclaim, “It has all been proven.” I have yet to find any evidence except fossil remains of ancient animals in stratification with an odd ‘explosion’ (all scientists use this terminology, so it should not offend the scientific minds of Darwinian thinking). There is no more proof that one hip bone is related to another hip socket than one can prove the existence of God.
The religionists cannot prove that God exists, except the spiritual witness they feel within, and the Evolutionists cannot prove Charles Darwin’s poorly scripted hypothesis is anything but true, except their excitement in digging through stratifications, believing that the emergence of a more developed animal proves mutational selectivity upgrading itself. There are no explanations, for example for all the microbial life form fossils at the first strata. It has become a game of ‘Pick Your Own Ancestor.’
Also the DNA genome similarities of apes to man does not prove anything, except in the eye and mind of the beholder. With the new research dealing with the mRNA possessing the protein information and the miRNA appearing to posses the instructions and directional information, the closeness of one animal to another means only that a preprogrammed DNA went through transcription and mRNAs and miRNAs have the knowledge to produce billions of similar creatures without any relationship whatsoever. And if one was to analyze the probability of the DNA molecule alone without out the cells, the membrane, the transcription machines which know what to do and the holding containers where the proteins fold, plus all the other little hundred little mechanics that had to be operational first so the DNA could work its wonders. An individual would have to be deaf to the truth; blind to reality, and stupid to the issue of these pieces mutating to operate, with Negative Entropy as a nemesis, a parent would not survive long enough to have offspring let alone last a thousand years for “unguided mutational selectivity” to magically to it job. Talk about believing in the Easter Bunny and Santa Clause. Darwinian Swiss Cheese is the proof alone of a Divine Creator. There needs to be none other.
However, to side with the Scientists, Creation is a long process, and that is where Theology has missed the boat in ‘bible-thumping’ and being ignorant about ancient languages, translation, scribal prejudice, and the multiplicity of copies of all the early tests, let alone the very fact it is easier for Jehovah to say to Moses concerning the Creation, I said, “Let there be Light;” rather than bringing volumes on particle physics, chemistry, botany, biology, and nuclear fusion. Religionists, God used knowledge and science in creation. Look around, the testimony is in front of you. If you would not be so stubborn about the ‘literal 6-day, 24-hour time clock,’ or the 6,000 years of creation; but learn a bit of truth from scientists, maybe the scientists would not be agnostics or atheists.
I do not care about percentages of scientists who go to church and believe. It is a pointless debate. To place one's argument against the Purpose and Design in Physics and Creation, based upon the number of PhD’s whom are atheists is poor logic indeed, even if 96% claimed no belief in a Creator God. Conversely, scientists holding to the Theory of Intelligent Design, or Determined Creationism, also have no more validation of Theories due to numbers of followers. Scientific facts and physical laws, which subatomic particles seem to obey and abide by, whether these principles are fully understood or yet to be discovered by mankind, are matters of fact in spite of a majority consensus.
When creationists hold us score cards demonstrating how many scientists are believer, and use the numbers for substantiation, their arguments are mute. It matters not if the entire scientific community is against a true principle. Percentage of voters does not validate an Axiom, Hypothesis, or Theory. I will oppose the lofty realm of Scientific jargon and use the common accepted definitions applied to these words. I distain ‘science’ jargon gone wrong, when used to elevate one to a lofty realm of academia.
Theodore Menline Bernstein, associate editor loved pointing lancets to attorneys, physicians, and scientists for their wordy missing the target attempt of expression, in his famous book, entitled, The Careful Writer, Bernstein wittingly wrote:
“In nature wind and fog do not normally coexist.
In language, however, they sometimes do, and the greater the wind the more impenetrable the fog.
This linguistic writing style is known as Windfoggery.
Windfoggery embraces gobbledygook, that wordy, involved and often unintelligible language usually
associated with bureaucracy and big business. But it also includes the self-important circumlocution of ordinary orators, the pretentious pseudoscientific jargon of the pseudosciences, and the monumental unintelligibility of some criticism of those arts that do not readily accept the bridle of plain words."
Dr. Dawkins, when cornered has lowered his number on several occasions, as much as down to 55%. He does not know; because he allowed that spark of the divine do burn out. Pure Science and Pure Religion come from the same Creative Source. The Almighty controls the elements. Christ controlled the elements of the H2O molecules to support his weight. His Father can bring order out of chaos. And in the original Hebrew the translation is closer to 'organization' and 'order' of existing matter; not creating matter out of nothing.
As with the three laws of thermodynamics, matter cannot be created or destroyed and the laws of Thermodynamics are a subset to the Laws of Pure Matter.
Matter can exist in at least four different forms:
1. Matter – all subatomic particles which make up the Neutron have a magnetic charge
2. Light
3. Energy
4. Gravity
It is when the Ultimate Black Hole (a Class 4 Black Hole), which still contains all of the subatomic particles – even light and energy are again in the state of matter of billion of galaxies – this last stage of a Black Holes (Class 4) are unstable like the miniature counterpart, the Neutron, which has a decay life of 14 minutes before the laws of magnetism force it apart to become a Hydrogen Atom. The Class 4 Black Hole is also unstable, since two opposing charges cannot exist in the exact same space and time. Gravity will eventually give way. The repulsion of polarity is far too great at this density for even gravity to hold the sphere together.
A typical Class 4 Black Hole would consist of 90 to 140 billion galaxies, compressed roughly to the size of our moon. However it would be a time bomb. When the decay process would begin, it would be over in an instant. Therefore, the symbolic words "Let there be Light!" would express all those who had faith in Divine determinism, would not need to have a library of explanation. With great unimaginable force, Neutrons would be thrown in a parabolic explosion, and shortly decaying into Hydrogen. The formation of galaxies and their black holes would be next, then suns, and in time suns running their progressive course until super novas produced all the elements needed for creation. There is no singularity. That hypothesis is absurd.
Unfortunately, Dawkins is both sloppy in his arrogance and guessed calculations and has entirely disseminated his doctrine to the duped masses.
EPLAPOOL.com
The “Established Physical Laws and Patterns for the Origins of Life,” due to a Paradigm Shift in Terminology, rejects Darwinian Evolution. The second law of Thermodynamics, Negative Entropy would have reached its maximum, making it impossible for “Unguided Life“ to take a foothold. This Website opposes Darwinian theories. In short, his "Unguided Mutational Selectivity" has no more scientific basis than the 13th Century theory that the "Earth was the Center of the Solar System."
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Monday, May 24, 2010
Inherit the Wind - 1955 play by Jerome Lawrence & Robert Lee
"Inherit the Wind" is a 1955 play, based (as closely as motion pictures are on "True Stories.") on the story of the 1925 Trial, where John T. Scopes, a science teacher was convicted for teaching Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution to high school students in Dayton, Tennessee, which was in conflict to The Butler Act, a Tennessee State law banning instruction of evolution, although Evolution was included in a chapter of a biology book in 1925, from which Scopes was teaching. In the play, the fictional characters of Matthew Harrison Brady, Henry Drummond, Bertram Cates and E.K. Hornbeck correspond to the historical figures of William Jennings Bryan (prosecuting attorney), Clarence Darrow (defending attorney), John Scopes (convicted school teacher), and H.L. Mencken (newspaper reporter with a large circulation).
It should be clearly understood that the playwrights, Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee, stated in the opening of their production, that the play was by no means a historical account; but the intent was to condemn McCarthyism or anti-Communist investigations that were ongoing at that time. The authors used the 1925 Scopes trial as the conditions that threatens intellectual freedom. The trial was better known as the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The case ended on July 21, 1925, finding John Scopes guilty, who was fined $100 by the judge. In an appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Butler Act was held to be constitutional; however reversed Scopes' guilty conviction because the judge with the original trial had set the fine instead of the jury.
The play, five-years later was made into a motion picture of the same title, staring Spencer Tracy - portraying Henry Drummond, the defending attorney; Fredric March, the prosecuting 'fundamentalists' attorney; John Scopes was portrayed by Dick York (later to be cast as the husband in television series "Bewitched"); Gene Kelly was excellent as the sardonic newspaper reporter; and Harry Morgan, the Dayton, Tennessee judge. An excellent motion picture that I highly recommend to all. [Information obtained from Wikimedia Free Encyclopedia.]
Some very powerful and insightful quotes from the characters are in Act 3, the closing of the play. In the court room, Matthew Brady in emotionally filled closing remarks falls over dead with a heart attack. Sometime after the courtroom is emptied except for the defendant, Hornbeck, the defending attorney, Drummond, who is cleaning up his papers. Drummond says, as he packs, "I can't imagine a world without Matthew Harrison Brady." The school teacher Cates, still sitting at the table, asked what he died from. Hornbeck, like a sadistic undertaker waiting to hammer in the last nail, says "a busted belly" and continues commenting that they shouldn't weep for him, for Brady had cried enough for himself and wrote his own obituary - calling him "a Barnum-bunkum, Bible-beating bastard." An angry Drummond now turns on Hornbeck, reminding him he has no more right to spit on Brady's religion than on his own lack of religion. After the outburst, Drummond, slowly turns and continues packing, saying with the sadness of losing a friend, "There was much greatness in the man." Hornbeck continues to poke at Drummond's emotional buttons, taunting him for an emotion response, which he receives; but not as he expects.
Drummond turns and says, I feel sorry for you and asks him, who's going to come and weep to your funeral? Informing Hornbeck that he is nothing but a "sorry slob." Hornbeck still mocking Brady and how glad that he's gone, walks to the witness stand, flips through the Bible, but Drummond not looking at him is still slowly methodically packing, knows the words, and slowly quotes from the book of Proverbs, "He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool shall be servant to the wise in heart."
Hornbeck mocks Drummond, the supposed agnostic. Drummond turns on Hornbeck, telling him that he is tired of him. He who never puts a noun and verb together except to blow something up. Hornbeck accuses Drummond of kindness, conscience, and sentimentality. Drummond says that Brady had the same right as Cates, the right to be wrong, adding that a giant once lived in Brady's body but he got lost looking for God too high up. Hornbeck calls Drummond a hypocrite and an atheist who believes in God, and walks out of the room. Drummond picks up a copy of Darwin's, "Origin of the Species and the Descent of Man," weighs it in one hand, while holding the Bible in the other, places both books together and walks slowly out as the lights fade. So ends a illuminating human drama in a hot Tennessee courtroom, where a teacher stood up for the quest for knowledge.
http://www.gradesaver.com/inherit-the-wind/study-guide/section5/
Today, tragically, the doors to Intellectual Freedom are again closed. This time they are Iron-clad and welded shut, not only for teaching about a Higher Powerful Creator God; but any Controversial Scientific Theories that do not have the signature of Charles Darwin validating them.
It only took 3 seconds for the apple to hit Newton on his head and a lifetime to postulate the meaning. An atheistic Darwin endured only 5 short weeks on Gallipolis Island and forever destroyed others to bring to bare Scientific Theories involving the Creation and the origin of Life. Darwin destroyed anyone dare to look into the complexities that had to be in place precisely reacting to pre-existing regulations and laws before any self-replicating molecule or cell could emerge from elements in a primordial goop. Rules and regulations were not made up as the game went on. However since no observable nor replications have been duplicated in the labs which can substantiate his 'non-testable' claims - why do intelligent scientists not questioned the reasons for the failures? And planting a genome into an existing cell membrane with folded proteins with function by a receint scientist, boasting of making the 'first replicating cell.' Is like a farmer taking credit for life when he plants a seed.
One hundred and fifty years of failures would water-down my resolve; therefore I give serious pause why not one laboratory technician would stop and ask - as a chef in a restaurant - "What's wrong with the recipe?"
But frantic to live a lie, failure seems to keep fueling a endless, hopeless experiment, while yet the continual pedantic flowing of extolling false affirmation for a 'flat-earth fable theory continues to perpetuate.' Decades of exhaustive testing will not duplicate or affirm a poor system of theories. How can these self-appointed authorities mandate that Darwin be correct concerning creation’s complexities when unable to duplicate the process in a closed system? How do they ascertain that nature will mutate to a more complex assemblage - atom to atom in covalent and non-covalent bonding, make more and more complex molecules in an “Open System” with increasing negative entropy as a nemesis?
Maintaining the magician's smoke, Darwinian-duped PhD’s of all disciplines, are eager to force-feed younger minds for future disciples of this false 'church' doctrine (I am using the Hebrew root for church). Since the tragedy that happened in Tennessee in 1925, the drama is ongoing; but this time, has "Evolved" to one of Reverse Discrimination in Freedom for Intellectual Pursuit of teachers to present to hungry minds other valid scientific theories for the origin of life and creation as well.
When Darwin did announce his theory (unproven hypothesis), another Evolutionary Theory, just as scientifically based, was put forth by Alfred P. Wallace, an associate of Charles Darwin, until the two men forever separated paths, after Charles declared his damnable doctrine of Selectivity. It was not just 'survival of the fittest;' but “unguided mutational selectivity.” Unless there are forces or laws by which nature is acted upon, nature by it very definition will degrade, as a rotting apple. Though once these men were colleagues; however they parted company on one very crucial and basic foundation of thought, that of Survival of the Fittest by atheistic “Unguided Mutational Selectivity.” Darwin’s main thrust was randomness, while Wallace's was Purpose or Determinism.
It is because of Darwin’s ‘floating foundation’ that research scientists cannot by logic research connect the dots without gapping holes of logic. Scientists, who can still think, cannot ignore the many inconsistencies of Darwinian Concepts. There are too many solutions which Darwinian thinking simply cannot validate. In other words: Charles Darwin constructed his ‘Tree of Life’ upside-down, ignoring the cell.
I do not intend to dance around the issue; but come onto Darwinian illogic with a full head of steam. This URL's series of essays will not focus on Religion; but will focus on Science. If anyone reads into them otherwise, they are using their own dictionary and glasses. To state my intent again succinctly, I will use the Theories of Alfred R. Wallace of "Purpose and Determinism" as a bounce board; however since Wallace also coined his theory as Evolution, I am finding myself in difficulty with the very word. ‘Evolution’ has such a stronghold on Darwinian philosophy, and since evolution in and of itself - even in Darwinian circles implies a myriad of concepts, I choose for clarification, now and into the future, to make a Paradigm Shift in terminology, away from the very mention of Evolution, Selectivity, or Unguided Mutation. I choose to coin my own theories as if they be Tectonic Plates of ideas, which will split the Academic Landscape by a Catastrophic Chasm of Creation’s Paradigm. Therefore I lay claim to: “Established Physical Laws and Patterns for the Origin of Life.”
Using a ruling upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 1987, in the case of Edward vs. Aguillard, the Court ruled that “Teaching a variety of scientific theories about the Origins of Humankind to Schoolchildren might be validly done with clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of Science Instruction.” The EPLAPOOL will meet the Supreme Court criteria and Scientific criteria.
As the ‘Flat-world Notions’ were toppled without emotions from onlookers, when upgraded and newfound information challenged unfounded dogma, so will the clay pillars of Darwinian Evolution topple to the Truths of the Universe and Creation embodied in EPLAPOLA. Although some paleontology-biologists have feebly argued, that Life on Earth has no relationship to the origin of the Cosmos, I take these blinded puppets to task. For all life has a great deal, yea, all life is Cosmic in origin.
Many individuals, not wishing to ‘rock the boat’ of established unintelligible Darwinian Theories - can cautiously keeping one foot upon Darwinian soil while straddling the fence and planting the other foot on Intelligent Design territory (or for this discussion - ’Uncommon Descent’).
Wallacinian Theories is an all or nothing proposition. One cannot teach ‘Controversy’ while criticizing the established Darwin’s Thinking without openly challenging the very controversy of Darwin‘s Evolution. Throw down the Gantlet of Challenge and let the chips fall where they may. They will fall for Truth and against Darwin. One does not accomplish freedom in education by Challenging ‘Unguided Mutational Selectivity’ using a non-challenging stance. One is either for Charles Darwin’s Theories of Atheistic Unguided Mutation, or one must be prepared to fight City Hall.
“And his servant said unto Elisha, Alas, my master! how shall we do?
“And Elisha answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.
(2 Kings 6:15-16) (This is not a Religious statement; but a needed reminder for the sleepy.)
The NCSE’s myopic stand of … “ONLY ONE THOUGHT.” Backwardly, mirrors that of religiosity in the 14th Century, by sequestering the teaching of any other Religious or Scientific Theory. According to their URL, they uphold Darwinian Theory; thereby violating the Supreme Court’s ruling in 1987, and are publicly at war with “Teaching a variety of scientific theories about the Origins of Humankind to Schoolchildren might be validly done with clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of Science Instruction.” Clearer theories of the Origin of Life other than the ‘Earth-is-the-Center-of-the-Universe’ Darwinian Theory legally should be in the curriculum now - not in 20 years - but now. All valid Scientific Theories should be made available to the students via the instructor and the instructor needs to be free to do so. Had the NCSE existed in the 14th or 15th Centuries, their mandated mindset would have killed Tyndale for publishing the ‘unprintable,’ and ‘required penitence’ from Newton or Galileo who tried to forward Scientific thinking.
And so the story of John Scopes is more true in the classrooms of today then of 1925. But in this sad tale, the NCSE is shutting the door on Alternative Scientific Theories regarding the Creation and the Origin of Life on Earth. We have the Scientific Theories. We have the Legal rights to teach Scientific Instruction with validity and clarity with secular intent. Let us move forward, and not “Inherit the Wind.”
“The grand aim of all science is to cover the greatest number of empirical facts by logical deduction from the smallest number of hypotheses or axioms.” - Albert Einstein -
It should be clearly understood that the playwrights, Jerome Lawrence and Robert Edwin Lee, stated in the opening of their production, that the play was by no means a historical account; but the intent was to condemn McCarthyism or anti-Communist investigations that were ongoing at that time. The authors used the 1925 Scopes trial as the conditions that threatens intellectual freedom. The trial was better known as the Scopes Monkey Trial.
The case ended on July 21, 1925, finding John Scopes guilty, who was fined $100 by the judge. In an appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Butler Act was held to be constitutional; however reversed Scopes' guilty conviction because the judge with the original trial had set the fine instead of the jury.
The play, five-years later was made into a motion picture of the same title, staring Spencer Tracy - portraying Henry Drummond, the defending attorney; Fredric March, the prosecuting 'fundamentalists' attorney; John Scopes was portrayed by Dick York (later to be cast as the husband in television series "Bewitched"); Gene Kelly was excellent as the sardonic newspaper reporter; and Harry Morgan, the Dayton, Tennessee judge. An excellent motion picture that I highly recommend to all. [Information obtained from Wikimedia Free Encyclopedia.]
Some very powerful and insightful quotes from the characters are in Act 3, the closing of the play. In the court room, Matthew Brady in emotionally filled closing remarks falls over dead with a heart attack. Sometime after the courtroom is emptied except for the defendant, Hornbeck, the defending attorney, Drummond, who is cleaning up his papers. Drummond says, as he packs, "I can't imagine a world without Matthew Harrison Brady." The school teacher Cates, still sitting at the table, asked what he died from. Hornbeck, like a sadistic undertaker waiting to hammer in the last nail, says "a busted belly" and continues commenting that they shouldn't weep for him, for Brady had cried enough for himself and wrote his own obituary - calling him "a Barnum-bunkum, Bible-beating bastard." An angry Drummond now turns on Hornbeck, reminding him he has no more right to spit on Brady's religion than on his own lack of religion. After the outburst, Drummond, slowly turns and continues packing, saying with the sadness of losing a friend, "There was much greatness in the man." Hornbeck continues to poke at Drummond's emotional buttons, taunting him for an emotion response, which he receives; but not as he expects.
Drummond turns and says, I feel sorry for you and asks him, who's going to come and weep to your funeral? Informing Hornbeck that he is nothing but a "sorry slob." Hornbeck still mocking Brady and how glad that he's gone, walks to the witness stand, flips through the Bible, but Drummond not looking at him is still slowly methodically packing, knows the words, and slowly quotes from the book of Proverbs, "He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool shall be servant to the wise in heart."
Hornbeck mocks Drummond, the supposed agnostic. Drummond turns on Hornbeck, telling him that he is tired of him. He who never puts a noun and verb together except to blow something up. Hornbeck accuses Drummond of kindness, conscience, and sentimentality. Drummond says that Brady had the same right as Cates, the right to be wrong, adding that a giant once lived in Brady's body but he got lost looking for God too high up. Hornbeck calls Drummond a hypocrite and an atheist who believes in God, and walks out of the room. Drummond picks up a copy of Darwin's, "Origin of the Species and the Descent of Man," weighs it in one hand, while holding the Bible in the other, places both books together and walks slowly out as the lights fade. So ends a illuminating human drama in a hot Tennessee courtroom, where a teacher stood up for the quest for knowledge.
http://www.gradesaver.com/inherit-the-wind/study-guide/section5/
Today, tragically, the doors to Intellectual Freedom are again closed. This time they are Iron-clad and welded shut, not only for teaching about a Higher Powerful Creator God; but any Controversial Scientific Theories that do not have the signature of Charles Darwin validating them.
It only took 3 seconds for the apple to hit Newton on his head and a lifetime to postulate the meaning. An atheistic Darwin endured only 5 short weeks on Gallipolis Island and forever destroyed others to bring to bare Scientific Theories involving the Creation and the origin of Life. Darwin destroyed anyone dare to look into the complexities that had to be in place precisely reacting to pre-existing regulations and laws before any self-replicating molecule or cell could emerge from elements in a primordial goop. Rules and regulations were not made up as the game went on. However since no observable nor replications have been duplicated in the labs which can substantiate his 'non-testable' claims - why do intelligent scientists not questioned the reasons for the failures? And planting a genome into an existing cell membrane with folded proteins with function by a receint scientist, boasting of making the 'first replicating cell.' Is like a farmer taking credit for life when he plants a seed.
One hundred and fifty years of failures would water-down my resolve; therefore I give serious pause why not one laboratory technician would stop and ask - as a chef in a restaurant - "What's wrong with the recipe?"
But frantic to live a lie, failure seems to keep fueling a endless, hopeless experiment, while yet the continual pedantic flowing of extolling false affirmation for a 'flat-earth fable theory continues to perpetuate.' Decades of exhaustive testing will not duplicate or affirm a poor system of theories. How can these self-appointed authorities mandate that Darwin be correct concerning creation’s complexities when unable to duplicate the process in a closed system? How do they ascertain that nature will mutate to a more complex assemblage - atom to atom in covalent and non-covalent bonding, make more and more complex molecules in an “Open System” with increasing negative entropy as a nemesis?
Maintaining the magician's smoke, Darwinian-duped PhD’s of all disciplines, are eager to force-feed younger minds for future disciples of this false 'church' doctrine (I am using the Hebrew root for church). Since the tragedy that happened in Tennessee in 1925, the drama is ongoing; but this time, has "Evolved" to one of Reverse Discrimination in Freedom for Intellectual Pursuit of teachers to present to hungry minds other valid scientific theories for the origin of life and creation as well.
When Darwin did announce his theory (unproven hypothesis), another Evolutionary Theory, just as scientifically based, was put forth by Alfred P. Wallace, an associate of Charles Darwin, until the two men forever separated paths, after Charles declared his damnable doctrine of Selectivity. It was not just 'survival of the fittest;' but “unguided mutational selectivity.” Unless there are forces or laws by which nature is acted upon, nature by it very definition will degrade, as a rotting apple. Though once these men were colleagues; however they parted company on one very crucial and basic foundation of thought, that of Survival of the Fittest by atheistic “Unguided Mutational Selectivity.” Darwin’s main thrust was randomness, while Wallace's was Purpose or Determinism.
It is because of Darwin’s ‘floating foundation’ that research scientists cannot by logic research connect the dots without gapping holes of logic. Scientists, who can still think, cannot ignore the many inconsistencies of Darwinian Concepts. There are too many solutions which Darwinian thinking simply cannot validate. In other words: Charles Darwin constructed his ‘Tree of Life’ upside-down, ignoring the cell.
I do not intend to dance around the issue; but come onto Darwinian illogic with a full head of steam. This URL's series of essays will not focus on Religion; but will focus on Science. If anyone reads into them otherwise, they are using their own dictionary and glasses. To state my intent again succinctly, I will use the Theories of Alfred R. Wallace of "Purpose and Determinism" as a bounce board; however since Wallace also coined his theory as Evolution, I am finding myself in difficulty with the very word. ‘Evolution’ has such a stronghold on Darwinian philosophy, and since evolution in and of itself - even in Darwinian circles implies a myriad of concepts, I choose for clarification, now and into the future, to make a Paradigm Shift in terminology, away from the very mention of Evolution, Selectivity, or Unguided Mutation. I choose to coin my own theories as if they be Tectonic Plates of ideas, which will split the Academic Landscape by a Catastrophic Chasm of Creation’s Paradigm. Therefore I lay claim to: “Established Physical Laws and Patterns for the Origin of Life.”
Using a ruling upheld by the United States Supreme Court in 1987, in the case of Edward vs. Aguillard, the Court ruled that “Teaching a variety of scientific theories about the Origins of Humankind to Schoolchildren might be validly done with clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of Science Instruction.” The EPLAPOOL will meet the Supreme Court criteria and Scientific criteria.
As the ‘Flat-world Notions’ were toppled without emotions from onlookers, when upgraded and newfound information challenged unfounded dogma, so will the clay pillars of Darwinian Evolution topple to the Truths of the Universe and Creation embodied in EPLAPOLA. Although some paleontology-biologists have feebly argued, that Life on Earth has no relationship to the origin of the Cosmos, I take these blinded puppets to task. For all life has a great deal, yea, all life is Cosmic in origin.
Many individuals, not wishing to ‘rock the boat’ of established unintelligible Darwinian Theories - can cautiously keeping one foot upon Darwinian soil while straddling the fence and planting the other foot on Intelligent Design territory (or for this discussion - ’Uncommon Descent’).
Wallacinian Theories is an all or nothing proposition. One cannot teach ‘Controversy’ while criticizing the established Darwin’s Thinking without openly challenging the very controversy of Darwin‘s Evolution. Throw down the Gantlet of Challenge and let the chips fall where they may. They will fall for Truth and against Darwin. One does not accomplish freedom in education by Challenging ‘Unguided Mutational Selectivity’ using a non-challenging stance. One is either for Charles Darwin’s Theories of Atheistic Unguided Mutation, or one must be prepared to fight City Hall.
“And his servant said unto Elisha, Alas, my master! how shall we do?
“And Elisha answered, Fear not: for they that be with us are more than they that be with them.
(2 Kings 6:15-16) (This is not a Religious statement; but a needed reminder for the sleepy.)
The NCSE’s myopic stand of … “ONLY ONE THOUGHT.” Backwardly, mirrors that of religiosity in the 14th Century, by sequestering the teaching of any other Religious or Scientific Theory. According to their URL, they uphold Darwinian Theory; thereby violating the Supreme Court’s ruling in 1987, and are publicly at war with “Teaching a variety of scientific theories about the Origins of Humankind to Schoolchildren might be validly done with clear secular intent of enhancing the effectiveness of Science Instruction.” Clearer theories of the Origin of Life other than the ‘Earth-is-the-Center-of-the-Universe’ Darwinian Theory legally should be in the curriculum now - not in 20 years - but now. All valid Scientific Theories should be made available to the students via the instructor and the instructor needs to be free to do so. Had the NCSE existed in the 14th or 15th Centuries, their mandated mindset would have killed Tyndale for publishing the ‘unprintable,’ and ‘required penitence’ from Newton or Galileo who tried to forward Scientific thinking.
And so the story of John Scopes is more true in the classrooms of today then of 1925. But in this sad tale, the NCSE is shutting the door on Alternative Scientific Theories regarding the Creation and the Origin of Life on Earth. We have the Scientific Theories. We have the Legal rights to teach Scientific Instruction with validity and clarity with secular intent. Let us move forward, and not “Inherit the Wind.”
“The grand aim of all science is to cover the greatest number of empirical facts by logical deduction from the smallest number of hypotheses or axioms.” - Albert Einstein -
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)